header-logo header-logo

Better late than never?

07 July 2011 / Craig Barlow , Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

When can non-domestic rate demands be challenged ask Aidan Briggs
& Craig Barlow

Nearly every business in the country pays National Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) on their premises and this accounts for £19.6bn of local authority revenue nationwide. However, £400m of rates which are “collectible” go uncollected each year.

In his judgments in North Somerset District Council v Honda Motor Europe Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 1505 (QB), and Secerno Ltd v Oxford Magistrates’ Court & Vale of White Horse District Council [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin), Mr Justice Burnett addresses when a business may challenge a liability order for NNDR on the grounds of delay by the local authority. Both decisions give a thorough analysis of the legislation, but leave some glaring inconsistencies in the law’s treatment of delay and prejudice.

The statutory scheme

Liability to pay domestic rates arises by s 43 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. Under the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1058) (the 1989 regs), billing authorities are required to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll