header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Craig Barlow , Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Better late than never?

When can non-domestic rate demands be challenged ask Aidan Briggs
& Craig Barlow

Nearly every business in the country pays National Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) on their premises and this accounts for £19.6bn of local authority revenue nationwide. However, £400m of rates which are “collectible” go uncollected each year.

In his judgments in North Somerset District Council v Honda Motor Europe Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 1505 (QB), and Secerno Ltd v Oxford Magistrates’ Court & Vale of White Horse District Council [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin), Mr Justice Burnett addresses when a business may challenge a liability order for NNDR on the grounds of delay by the local authority. Both decisions give a thorough analysis of the legislation, but leave some glaring inconsistencies in the law’s treatment of delay and prejudice.

The statutory scheme

Liability to pay domestic rates arises by s 43 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. Under the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1058) (the 1989 regs), billing authorities are required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll