header-logo header-logo

Better late than never?

07 July 2011 / Craig Barlow , Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

When can non-domestic rate demands be challenged ask Aidan Briggs
& Craig Barlow

Nearly every business in the country pays National Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) on their premises and this accounts for £19.6bn of local authority revenue nationwide. However, £400m of rates which are “collectible” go uncollected each year.

In his judgments in North Somerset District Council v Honda Motor Europe Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 1505 (QB), and Secerno Ltd v Oxford Magistrates’ Court & Vale of White Horse District Council [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin), Mr Justice Burnett addresses when a business may challenge a liability order for NNDR on the grounds of delay by the local authority. Both decisions give a thorough analysis of the legislation, but leave some glaring inconsistencies in the law’s treatment of delay and prejudice.

The statutory scheme

Liability to pay domestic rates arises by s 43 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. Under the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1058) (the 1989 regs), billing authorities are required to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll