header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Craig Barlow , Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Better late than never?

When can non-domestic rate demands be challenged ask Aidan Briggs
& Craig Barlow

Nearly every business in the country pays National Non-Domestic Rates (NNDR) on their premises and this accounts for £19.6bn of local authority revenue nationwide. However, £400m of rates which are “collectible” go uncollected each year.

In his judgments in North Somerset District Council v Honda Motor Europe Ltd & ors [2010] EWHC 1505 (QB), and Secerno Ltd v Oxford Magistrates’ Court & Vale of White Horse District Council [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin), Mr Justice Burnett addresses when a business may challenge a liability order for NNDR on the grounds of delay by the local authority. Both decisions give a thorough analysis of the legislation, but leave some glaring inconsistencies in the law’s treatment of delay and prejudice.

The statutory scheme

Liability to pay domestic rates arises by s 43 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. Under the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1058) (the 1989 regs), billing authorities are required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll