header-logo header-logo

Better together?

26 January 2012 / Viv Williams , Phil Jepson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Viv Williams & Phil Jepson tap into the merger discussions sweeping the legal profession...

According to research by Baker Tilley, 75% of UK law firms have spent some or all of the last year in discussions about mergers with other firms and many have offered themselves to larger practices as a potential exit plan. In the US, law firm mergers are up by 80% in the first three quarters of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, with the market driven by transactions involving smaller firms.

Why is it that in the UK transaction volumes remain low, especially in comparison to volumes of discussions? First, it’s useful to consider the drivers forcing law firms to review their businesses and consider changing their shape and size:
  • The Legal Services Act: this is not only worrying the high street but also larger firms who fear attack from well-funded, but as yet unidentified, outsiders.
  • The economy: this has undermined the finances of most firms and removed the comfort that firms previously enjoyed. The oft-used refrain—“we are
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll