header-logo header-logo

26 January 2012 / Viv Williams , Phil Jepson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Better together?

Viv Williams & Phil Jepson tap into the merger discussions sweeping the legal profession...

According to research by Baker Tilley, 75% of UK law firms have spent some or all of the last year in discussions about mergers with other firms and many have offered themselves to larger practices as a potential exit plan. In the US, law firm mergers are up by 80% in the first three quarters of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, with the market driven by transactions involving smaller firms.

Why is it that in the UK transaction volumes remain low, especially in comparison to volumes of discussions? First, it’s useful to consider the drivers forcing law firms to review their businesses and consider changing their shape and size:
  • The Legal Services Act: this is not only worrying the high street but also larger firms who fear attack from well-funded, but as yet unidentified, outsiders.
  • The economy: this has undermined the finances of most firms and removed the comfort that firms previously enjoyed. The oft-used refrain—“we are
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll