header-logo header-logo

07 May 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Between law & justice

web_robins_1

Jon Robins tackles the Justice Gap

Definitions are important. The “Justice Gap”, according to the human rights lawyer Michael Mansfield QC, refers to “the increasing section of the public too poor to afford a lawyer and not poor enough to qualify for legal aid”. “At the heart of any notion of a decent society is not only that we have rights and protections under the law but that we can enforce those rights and rely upon those protections if needed,”’ the radical lawyer went on to say.

 

The struggle for justice

If you don’t know, www.thejusticegap.com is the name of an online magazine about the law and justice aimed at the public. It’s a title that contains an implicit criticism. It is a recognition that the system isn’t working. That many people struggle to secure “access to justice”—not just vulnerable sections of the community or those without money.

The site was launched on 6 October 2011 as the dread LASPO was making its way through parliament. Sadly, the Mansfield definition now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll