header-logo header-logo

Between law & justice

07 May 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_robins_1

Jon Robins tackles the Justice Gap

Definitions are important. The “Justice Gap”, according to the human rights lawyer Michael Mansfield QC, refers to “the increasing section of the public too poor to afford a lawyer and not poor enough to qualify for legal aid”. “At the heart of any notion of a decent society is not only that we have rights and protections under the law but that we can enforce those rights and rely upon those protections if needed,”’ the radical lawyer went on to say.

 

The struggle for justice

If you don’t know, www.thejusticegap.com is the name of an online magazine about the law and justice aimed at the public. It’s a title that contains an implicit criticism. It is a recognition that the system isn’t working. That many people struggle to secure “access to justice”—not just vulnerable sections of the community or those without money.

The site was launched on 6 October 2011 as the dread LASPO was making its way through parliament. Sadly, the Mansfield definition now needs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll