header-logo header-logo

07 May 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Between law & justice

web_robins_1

Jon Robins tackles the Justice Gap

Definitions are important. The “Justice Gap”, according to the human rights lawyer Michael Mansfield QC, refers to “the increasing section of the public too poor to afford a lawyer and not poor enough to qualify for legal aid”. “At the heart of any notion of a decent society is not only that we have rights and protections under the law but that we can enforce those rights and rely upon those protections if needed,”’ the radical lawyer went on to say.

 

The struggle for justice

If you don’t know, www.thejusticegap.com is the name of an online magazine about the law and justice aimed at the public. It’s a title that contains an implicit criticism. It is a recognition that the system isn’t working. That many people struggle to secure “access to justice”—not just vulnerable sections of the community or those without money.

The site was launched on 6 October 2011 as the dread LASPO was making its way through parliament. Sadly, the Mansfield definition now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll