header-logo header-logo

14 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Banking , Fraud , Criminal , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Beware sanctions-busting clients

Solicitors have until the end of this week to comply with financial sanctions rules on frozen assets.

HM Treasury has given anyone who is holding frozen assets until 11 October to submit a report to the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI). The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) this week urged solicitors to check the latest HM Treasury Consolidated List of asset freeze targets to make sure they are not holding monies belonging to a client that is subject to financial sanctions.

Juliet Oliver, SRA General Counsel, said: ‘Solicitors are rightly being asked to make sure they are not helping anyone with dubious funding streams.

‘This risk exists for every single solicitor and law firm, whether conveyancing on the high street or handling global transactions. We would urge all of you to look at the review and, if a client is listed and you hold any of their assets, make a report as necessary.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll