header-logo header-logo

18 July 2013 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Features , Technology , Employment
printer mail-detail

Beware of the web

istock_000020262072medium

Employers must get their social media policies in order, say Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

The issue of social media use in the workplace context is one which is likely only to become more relevant as individuals increasingly operate their social lives online and merge the boundaries of professional and personal. In a recent article we considered the present position relating to disciplinary steps for comments posted on social media fora. (“Damage limitation") Smith v Trafford Housing Association [2012] EWHC 3221 illustrated the approach of the courts in upholding a claim for breach of contract, following the demotion of Smith for commenting on Facebook that gay marriage was “a step too far”. However, other cases referred to in that article demonstrated that an employer could fairly dismiss for derogatory postings, or those which brought the company into disrepute, particularly where a clear policy in this regard was in place. This area of law bears further consideration following a number of recent cases.

In Teggart v TeleTech UK Limited [2012]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll