header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Sam Cherry
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Beyond repair?

Sam Cherry on the lessons to be learned from the Wallbanks

Chancel repair liability has featured heavily in the media in recent weeks with the lead up to and subsequent selling of Glebe Farm via auction in Aston Cantlow by Andrew and Gail Wallbank. This well-documented saga began in 1990 when the Parochial Church Council (PCC) approached the Wallbanks to demand £6,000 to repair the chancel of the parish church.

The Wallbanks took advice on the issue and the ensuing legal battle began. Initially this resulted in the church winning the case at the High Court, but this was later overturned at the Court of Appeal under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). However, the PCC appealed to the House of Lords where they ruled that as the PCC is not a public body it was therefore exempt from HRA 1998. On 5 February 2007 the court delivered the quantum of costs as £189,986 plus VAT plus costs estimated at £250,000 bringing the total to around £500,000.

How did we get here?

The issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll