header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 February 2009 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Beyond satirical debate?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Roger Smith predicts an end to civil legal aid (and history) as we know it

'The Privy Council has escaped much academic investigation'

The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council (AJTC) has proved rather more effective than its predecessor, the Council on Tribunals. Its chair is Lord Newton, a heavy-hitting former Conservative minister who has attracted considerable respect for his commitment to the task of revamping the majority of tribunals into a new structure. Th us, the criticisms of the AJTC of the plans of the Legal Services Commission (LSC) for the future of what used to be called civil legal aid and advice should be taken seriously.
The tenor of the LSC’s plans can be inferred from the title of its consultation document: “Civil bid rounds for 2010 contracts”. The Commission presents its proposals as a bureaucratic, technical exercise. However, as the AJTC has twigged, there is more to them than that. Underneath all the jargon, the basic idea is to concentrate assistance to larger regional units of provision. The AJTC is concerned with the consequences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll