header-logo header-logo

Big business

19 January 2012 / Kate Balmer , Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Features , Tax , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Fisher QC & Kate Balmer tackle mediation in larger scale tax cases

 

The use of mediation in civil litigation practice, as a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), has become increasingly commonplace in recent years. Most notably, interest has increased following the advent of the Civil Procedure Rules in 1998 and the government-wide ADR pledge in 2001 (renewed last year). Until now, however, the use of mediation within the tax field has been rare in the UK. This position may be contrasted with that in other countries, such as the US and Australia, in which mediation has long been used to resolve tax disputes. In Australia, a leading academic writer (Fayle, Mediation in Tax Disputes (1999)) has recently commented that “there are many instances where mediation may assist in resolving the dispute more equitably, more efficiently, more economically and more satisfactorily, leaving relatively untrammeled the relationship between disputants”.

Notwithstanding, the introduction of express provisions relating to mediation in s 24 of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and ADR in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll