header-logo header-logo

Biometrics: in the public interest?

20 October 2017 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7766_zander

In a special NLJ report, Michael Zander reflects on public concern about the use & governance of facial images

  • Aspects of biometrics: proportionality, privacy, public interest.

Concern about police use of facial images is highlighted by Professor Paul Wiles in the Biometric Commissioner’s Annual Report for 2016-17: ‘Facial images are a powerful new biometric but the acceptance by the public of their use for crime control purposes may depend on the extent to which the governance arrangements provide assurance that their use will be in the public interest and intrusion into individual privacy is controlled and proportionate.’ (para 305)

The Report says that in July 2016 there were 19 million facial images on the Police National Computer (PND), over 16 million of which were searchable using facial recognition software. In addition, the Metropolitan Police had their own extensive collection, so 19 million was an underestimate of the numbers held. It was not known how many related to persons who had not been convicted.

The Home Office Review

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll