header-logo header-logo

Biometrics: in the public interest?

20 October 2017 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7766_zander

In a special NLJ report, Michael Zander reflects on public concern about the use & governance of facial images

  • Aspects of biometrics: proportionality, privacy, public interest.

Concern about police use of facial images is highlighted by Professor Paul Wiles in the Biometric Commissioner’s Annual Report for 2016-17: ‘Facial images are a powerful new biometric but the acceptance by the public of their use for crime control purposes may depend on the extent to which the governance arrangements provide assurance that their use will be in the public interest and intrusion into individual privacy is controlled and proportionate.’ (para 305)

The Report says that in July 2016 there were 19 million facial images on the Police National Computer (PND), over 16 million of which were searchable using facial recognition software. In addition, the Metropolitan Police had their own extensive collection, so 19 million was an underestimate of the numbers held. It was not known how many related to persons who had not been convicted.

The Home Office Review of the Use and Retention of Custody Images

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll