header-logo header-logo

A bit of common sense?

07 August 2015 / Samantha Ewing
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7664_ewing

Samantha Ewing considers the benefits of mediation in will disputes

How many practitioners have heard their client talk of the “principle of the matter” when dealing with will disputes? Too often clients proclaim confidently: “I don’t care about the cost, I want to see him in court!” However, litigation solicitors know all too well that clients care about the costs a great deal at the end of the matter, as do the courts and such an attitude is very costly.

Benefits of mediation

Mediation can be very stressful for the client. In particularly acrimonious family disputes, the thought of facing the other side can be too much for some to bear. Despite this, clients should always be encouraged to attend mediation (provided it is suitable to do so, see below) as it:

  • is cheaper for clients than a full trial, which will help to preserve the value of the estate for the family;
  • offers flexibility on the terms of settlement that can be agreed; and
  • potentially allows both sides to walk away with
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll