header-logo header-logo

06 March 2008 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Community care
printer mail-detail

A bit more time please

Michael Zander argues for a delay in the national roll-out of police station legal advice changes

The provision of free legal advice to suspects in the police station is one of the most important safeguards for the suspect, and is used by some 750,000 people per year—roughly half of those arrested.

The new scheme now being piloted in three areas, redirecting requests for a detainee’s own solicitor from the Defence Solicitor Call Centre (DSCC) to CDS Direct, is a threat not only to existing links between suspects and their lawyers but to the wellbeing of the system.
Tony McNulty, the home office minister, stated in Parliament that national roll-out of the new system would take place on 21 April but that roll-out could be postponed if that was necessary to deal with problems (House of Commons Delegated Legislation Committee, 21 January 2008, cols 10–11). Both the time frame and the method of the evaluation are inadequate.
 
THE EXISTING SYSTEM
Around three-fifths of suspects ask for their own
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll