header-logo header-logo

Blame-free divorce, but how fair?

04 March 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
73790
David Burrows takes issue with the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution law and rules
  • Summarises main provisions in Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, and rules made thereunder.
  • Compares new law with previous law. Identifies problematic areas.

This article provides a summary of the main provisions in the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution legislation, and in the rules which have now been made under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020) which legislated for the new law. A second article will pick up on a small number of legislative shortcomings in the new scheme which require further thought.

DDSA 2020 received royal assent on 20 June 2020. Draft rules under it were already under serious discussion by the Family Procedure Rules Committee (the committee delegated to produce rules for family proceedings) in December 2020. It took until 17 January 2022 for those rules to be laid before Parliament. And, though we are told commencement is intended to be 6 April, no commencement order has yet

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll