header-logo header-logo

Blame-free divorce, but how fair?

04 March 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
73790
David Burrows takes issue with the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution law and rules
  • Summarises main provisions in Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, and rules made thereunder.
  • Compares new law with previous law. Identifies problematic areas.

This article provides a summary of the main provisions in the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution legislation, and in the rules which have now been made under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020) which legislated for the new law. A second article will pick up on a small number of legislative shortcomings in the new scheme which require further thought.

DDSA 2020 received royal assent on 20 June 2020. Draft rules under it were already under serious discussion by the Family Procedure Rules Committee (the committee delegated to produce rules for family proceedings) in December 2020. It took until 17 January 2022 for those rules to be laid before Parliament. And, though we are told commencement is intended to be 6 April, no commencement order has yet

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll