header-logo header-logo

Blame-free divorce, but how fair?

04 March 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
73790
David Burrows takes issue with the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution law and rules
  • Summarises main provisions in Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, and rules made thereunder.
  • Compares new law with previous law. Identifies problematic areas.

This article provides a summary of the main provisions in the new divorce and civil partnership dissolution legislation, and in the rules which have now been made under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020) which legislated for the new law. A second article will pick up on a small number of legislative shortcomings in the new scheme which require further thought.

DDSA 2020 received royal assent on 20 June 2020. Draft rules under it were already under serious discussion by the Family Procedure Rules Committee (the committee delegated to produce rules for family proceedings) in December 2020. It took until 17 January 2022 for those rules to be laid before Parliament. And, though we are told commencement is intended to be 6 April, no commencement order has yet

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll