header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 November 2014 / Simon Hughes MP
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Opinion , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Bold reforms

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
hughes

Simon Hughes MP responds to Graham Lyons about the future of mediation

A few weeks ago Graham Lyons voiced his concerns in this journal about the government’s approach to mediation (see “No Minister!”, NLJ , 26 September 2014, p 8). I’d like to address the points that Mr Lyons raised.

We have made bold reforms to fix a family justice system described by the Family Justice Review in 2011 as “no system at all”. I welcome the support from those across the system who have helped to implement and bed in these reforms and pay tribute to the excellent work that’s already taking place.

The Family Mediation Task Force members have done great work looking at how to increase the uptake of mediation and I would like to thank them again for their recommendations. The Task Force was set up to reflect the make-up of the family justice system and it deliberately drew upon a wide range of expertise, including trained, practising mediators. David Norgrove, Chair of the Family Justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll