header-logo header-logo

06 November 2014 / Simon Hughes MP
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Opinion , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Bold reforms

hughes

Simon Hughes MP responds to Graham Lyons about the future of mediation

A few weeks ago Graham Lyons voiced his concerns in this journal about the government’s approach to mediation (see “No Minister!”, NLJ , 26 September 2014, p 8). I’d like to address the points that Mr Lyons raised.

We have made bold reforms to fix a family justice system described by the Family Justice Review in 2011 as “no system at all”. I welcome the support from those across the system who have helped to implement and bed in these reforms and pay tribute to the excellent work that’s already taking place.

The Family Mediation Task Force members have done great work looking at how to increase the uptake of mediation and I would like to thank them again for their recommendations. The Task Force was set up to reflect the make-up of the family justice system and it deliberately drew upon a wide range of expertise, including trained, practising mediators. David Norgrove, Chair of the Family Justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll