header-logo header-logo

Book review: Good Faith in Contract Law

28 February 2025 / Charles Wynn-Evans
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Contract
printer mail-detail
"This work more than fulfils its stated objective of seeking to be of use both to practitioners and academics alike"
  • Author: Christina Perry
  • Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
  • ISBN: 978-1-80392-965-1
  • RRP: £155

In contrast to various other legal systems, the contract law of England and Wales has traditionally rejected the imposition on contractual parties of a general duty of good faith, and has addressed potentially problematic conduct by the contractual parties by way of specific legal techniques such as misrepresentation, duress, and the implication of terms (whether in law or in fact). As Lord Justice Bingham put it in Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1987] EWCA Civ 6, the approach of English law has been to develop ‘piecemeal solutions in response to demonstrated problems of unfairness’.

The approach adopted in domestic contract law has, however, changed significantly over the past few years following the decision in Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corporation Ltd [2013] EWHC 111 (QB), in which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll