header-logo header-logo

14 March 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Book review: Class Actions in England and Wales

  • Editor: Damian Grave, Maura McIntosh and Gregg Rowan
  • Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell 
  • ISBN: 9780414057302
  • RRP: £199

The words ‘class action’ immediately bring to mind the alleged excesses of the US opt out class process that some might term the ‘hot coffee’ style of litigation, after the infamous litigation in which a consumer sued a restaurant for serving coffee that was too hot. So, it is a bold step to title a book on collective process this side of the pond ‘Class Actions’, particularly one written by the defence bar in the form of Herbert Smith Freehills. On the claimant bar side, we have long referred to class actions as a collective phrase for any claim with large numbers of claimants, but the term has proved unpopular with authorities both here and in Europe because of the connotations it brings of US-style class litigation. The defence bar and the business lobby like the American Chamber of Commerce have used the term pejoratively as a signal for all the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll