header-logo header-logo

29 October 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Book review: How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments (Second Edition)

“I would commend it to every advocate whose performance should be allied to their assessment of what is going in the judge’s head”

  • Author: Andrew Goodman
  • Publisher: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing
  • ISBN: 9780854902453
  • Pages: 268
  • RRP: £45

Like some legal columns, judgments go largely unread. When you think of the erudition, labour, love and ingenuity that goes into them (and the occasional illustration in patent cases, although the practice seems to be spreading to the Queen’s Bench Division, and we won’t mention the embedded coded message, eh?), that is a crying shame. Of course, the parties and their legal representatives will have an interest, doubtlessly starting at the final paragraph of a written job and working backwards. So will the media, if there’s an accompanying summary as in the Supreme Court, and will proceed to corrupt the decision and its implications for the general public unless there is an expert legal correspondent in the way.

Lessons from dirty dogs

Andrew Goodman’s fascinating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll