header-logo header-logo

Book review: How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments (Second Edition)

29 October 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

“I would commend it to every advocate whose performance should be allied to their assessment of what is going in the judge’s head”

  • Author: Andrew Goodman
  • Publisher: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing
  • ISBN: 9780854902453
  • Pages: 268
  • RRP: £45

Like some legal columns, judgments go largely unread. When you think of the erudition, labour, love and ingenuity that goes into them (and the occasional illustration in patent cases, although the practice seems to be spreading to the Queen’s Bench Division, and we won’t mention the embedded coded message, eh?), that is a crying shame. Of course, the parties and their legal representatives will have an interest, doubtlessly starting at the final paragraph of a written job and working backwards. So will the media, if there’s an accompanying summary as in the Supreme Court, and will proceed to corrupt the decision and its implications for the general public unless there is an expert legal correspondent in the way.

Lessons from dirty dogs

Andrew Goodman’s fascinating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll