header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Book review: Mental Health: Law and Practice

This is the second edition of a work published four years ago as Mental Health: the New Law.

Author: Phil Fennell
Publisher: Jordans, 2nd edition
ISBN: 978 1 84661 240 4  Price: £55.00

It has 12 chapters and an appendix that contains the entire Mental Health Act 1983 (and itself accounts for more than a quarter of the book).

The chapters of this edition resemble those of the last, and cover such things as the criteria for detention; the safeguards offered by advocates and the “nearest relative”; compulsory treatment; mentally disordered offenders; community powers; and the work of the mental health tribunal.

Thematic approach

This thematic approach distinguishes Professor Fennell’s book from its chief competitor: the veritable “bible” produced by Richard Jones since-Adam-was-a-lad, which is now in its thirteenth wrist-snapping edition. That book takes the Mental Health Act section-by-section and is sometimes less than nimble in linking different provisions or drawing on other statutes. This becomes more of an issue as legislation such as the Mental Capacity Act begins

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll