header-logo header-logo

04 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Boosting equality should be Bar priority

Barristers would have a professional obligation to advance equality, diversity & inclusion (EDI), under proposals to amend regulations

The change to the wording of Core Duty 8 would replace the current duty not to discriminate unlawfully.

A Bar Standards Board (BSB) ‘Consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rule’, launched this week, states: ‘In order to achieve the culture change needed, we believe the duty needs to go further.

‘We believe it should be a core expectation of all practising barristers that they demonstrate an appropriate commitment, through their practice, to equality, diversity and inclusion.’

The BSB also proposes moving to outcomes-based regulation of equality rules.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘While much progress has been made—thanks to the work of individuals, chambers, Inns, Specialist Bar Associations and others—there is clearly much more to be done.

‘Much of the progress made on EDI in chambers is thanks to the voluntary work of EDOs [equality and diversity officers] and we are keen to make sure that any regulatory changes do not undermine that work. Radical change is certainly disruptive and may have unintended detrimental consequences.  

‘On the proposals to move to outcomes-based regulation, we have previously raised concerns that this could pose significant challenges for the Bar and may be ineffective.’

The BSB previously proposed outcomes-based regulation in October 2023, ‘Consultation on the regulation of barristers in chambers’. Responding in February, the Bar Council warned this would pose ‘significant challenges’.

It said: ‘Barristers, generally, work long hours in an intellectually demanding job. Reading, considering and understanding outcomes, then devising ways to achieve them, is not a task that they have time or incentive to carry out.’

Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll