header-logo header-logo

Boundary disputes: the solicitor’s nightmare

29 November 2018 / Mark Whittell
Issue: 7819 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property , ADR
printer mail-detail

​Mark Whittell offers a novel solution to the stresses & strains of the boundary dispute

  • Mediation can provide a quick, cheap and practical alternative to the protracted and expensive process of resolving a boundary dispute in court.

To the file we all dread—the boundary dispute.

  • The client is acting on a point of principle.
  • The client will be irrational and not act commercially.
  • The costs will be totally disproportionate.
  • The reality is one party will have to move for them to be happy.
  • No matter how well you conduct yourself, the court is going to be highly critical of the fact you have not settled and the costs you have incurred.
  • And it will hang around in your filing cabinet for ages as it will not have any priority.

It all leads to a worried and dissatisfied client and a frustrated solicitor.

The problem

You will be litigating usually over a small strip or piece of land which will have a negligible value, but because of the complexity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll