header-logo header-logo

Breaking bonds

24 May 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring examines the approach to the dissolution of gay marriage

Much excitement greeted the first “gay divorce” to reach the Court of Appeal (Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, [2012] All ER (D) 225 (Mar)).

Technically, of course, the case dealt with the financial consequences of a dissolution of a civil partnership, not a divorce. But in the tabloid press and in the blogosphere, such niceties were avoided, in the discussions of whether “gay marriages” were to be treated any differently from straight ones.

Not so civil

Mr Lawrence was an equity partner at JP Morgan, while Mr Gallagher was an actor who had played the part of Bernadette in the stage version of Priscilla Queen of the Desert. They were 47 and 54 years old respectively, at the time of the dissolution. They had started cohabiting in February 1997, entered a civil partnership in December 2007, but by September 2008 they had separated and their civil partnership was dissolved in June 2009.

Mrs Justice Parker, an extremely experienced family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll