header-logo header-logo

23 June 2023 / Masood Ahmed , Lal Akhter
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Fees , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Breaking down the bill

127500
Agency fees or expert fees? Masood Ahmed & Lal Akhter clarify the rules surrounding fees paid to a medical reporting organisation when assessing costs
  • As part of the costs assessment process, the courts will expect the receiving party to provide a clear breakdown of the fees of any medical reporting agency instructed to provide expert reports.
  • A failure to provide a breakdown may result in the receiving party not recovering that element of their costs.
  • The decision in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin may impact more widely on the practice of agencies providing other expert services.

The issue which came before Judge Bird in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin (Administrator of the Estate of Pippa Hoskin (deceased)) (County Court at Manchester, on appeal) (22 May 2023) was this: is a receiving party (ie the party being paid its costs) required to provide a breakdown in its bill of costs between the cost of an expert’s report and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll