header-logo header-logo

23 June 2023 / Masood Ahmed , Lal Akhter
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Fees , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Breaking down the bill

127500
Agency fees or expert fees? Masood Ahmed & Lal Akhter clarify the rules surrounding fees paid to a medical reporting organisation when assessing costs
  • As part of the costs assessment process, the courts will expect the receiving party to provide a clear breakdown of the fees of any medical reporting agency instructed to provide expert reports.
  • A failure to provide a breakdown may result in the receiving party not recovering that element of their costs.
  • The decision in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin may impact more widely on the practice of agencies providing other expert services.

The issue which came before Judge Bird in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin (Administrator of the Estate of Pippa Hoskin (deceased)) (County Court at Manchester, on appeal) (22 May 2023) was this: is a receiving party (ie the party being paid its costs) required to provide a breakdown in its bill of costs between the cost of an expert’s report and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll