header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Breaking new ground

Outdated land law to be reformed under new proposals

The Law Commission has proposed wide-sweeping reforms to ancient land rights and obligations.
Its report, Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre, published last week, suggests simplifying and streamlining the law to make it easier for buyers, vendors, developers and mortgage-lenders to ascertain the often complex rights and responsibilities attaching to plots of land.

The proposals include simplifying the law of easements by prescription and implication, replacing restrictive covenants with “land obligations” and extending the jurisdiction of the lands chamber of the upper tribunal to cover easements, profits and land obligations.

LexisPSL property law solicitor, Malcolm Dowden said: “The Law Commission proposals offer an extremely sensible and practical response to a range of anomalies—some ancient, others far more recent creations of the court.    

“At the moment, an easement can lay unused for decades (in one case more than 150 years) but remain capable of being revived. The proposed reforms would establish a rebuttable presumption that an easement has been abandoned where it has not been used for at least 20 years. That change would radically shift the balance in favour of development, while preserving the right of the person with the benefit of an unused easement to show that an actual intention to use it remains.

“The proposal relating to the Law of Property Act 1925, s 62 is particularly welcome. It would remove the trap created by Hair v Gillman [2000] 3 EGLR 74, where a permission to park was transformed by a conveyance into a legally enforceable right binding all subsequent owners of the property.”

Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll