header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Robert Moss
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Breaking point

Leases: to break or not to break, asks Robert Moss

As Max Bialystock said in The Producers: “I picked the wrong play, the wrong director, the wrong cast. Where did I go right?”

No doubt the tenant in the recent decision of M W Trustees Limited and Others v Telular Corporation [2011] DEWHC104 must have had similar thoughts in relation to its successful attempt to break its lease.

The facts

The case concerned a lease which contained a typical tenant break which required the tenant to give notice to the landlord in writing, and specifically stated that notice would only be valid if served by special delivery or by hand.
In October 2008 the freehold interest in the property had been transferred by company S to the claimants, M W Trustees Limited, as trustees of the pension of Mr and Mrs Pozel, the other parties to the action. The new landlord appointed Mattioli Woods plc as managing agents and it informed the tenant of the change of landlord.

In August 2009 an officer of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll