header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011 / Emmanuel Guinchard
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Breaking point in Luxembourg

Emmanuel Guinchard forecasts breaking point in Luxembourg

The 2010 Annual Report of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) paints a bleak reality for two of its three courts—the Court of Justice and the General Court.

In 2010, the number of cases brought before the Court of Justice was the highest in its history. For several reasons, including the impact of the Lisbon Treaty, the number of new cases will continue to increase in the years to come. As a consequence, the court is facing an imminent workload crisis.

The General Court is already overloaded. In 2010, the average duration of proceedings before the General Court was nearly 25 months and the number of new cases continued to exceed that of completed cases. In contrast, the third legal arena of the CJEU, the Civil Service Tribunal, is a success story—even if the latest figures for 2010 reveal a slight deterioration in its performance.

In the light of the forthcoming (Court of Justice) or existing (General Court) workload crisis, the recent publication

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll