header-logo header-logo

Breaking the rules?

01 August 2014 / Daniel Brumpton , Jonathan Sachs
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
profession_sachs

Could solicitors face claims for failing to provide ATE insurance for litigation, ask Jonathan Sachs & Daniel Brumpton

The Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 applied between 1 July 2007 and 5 October 2011. In 2011, the Code of Conduct was changed and replaced by outcomes-focused regulation. Nevertheless, in respect of the required information about costs, the same provisions apply to both the 2007 Code of Conduct and the present Code of Conduct.

Paragraph 2.03 states as follows: “Information about the costs (1) You must give your client the best information possible about the likely overall cost of a matter, both at the outset and, when appropriate, as the matter progresses. In particular you must: (g) discuss with the client whether their liability for another party’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether specially purchased insurance may be obtained.”

The key word in the above paragraph is MUST. Therefore, a solicitor is obliged to advise a client as to whether specially purchased insurance may be obtained for a party’s liability to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll