header-logo header-logo

01 August 2014 / Daniel Brumpton , Jonathan Sachs
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Breaking the rules?

profession_sachs

Could solicitors face claims for failing to provide ATE insurance for litigation, ask Jonathan Sachs & Daniel Brumpton

The Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 applied between 1 July 2007 and 5 October 2011. In 2011, the Code of Conduct was changed and replaced by outcomes-focused regulation. Nevertheless, in respect of the required information about costs, the same provisions apply to both the 2007 Code of Conduct and the present Code of Conduct.

Paragraph 2.03 states as follows: “Information about the costs (1) You must give your client the best information possible about the likely overall cost of a matter, both at the outset and, when appropriate, as the matter progresses. In particular you must: (g) discuss with the client whether their liability for another party’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether specially purchased insurance may be obtained.”

The key word in the above paragraph is MUST. Therefore, a solicitor is obliged to advise a client as to whether specially purchased insurance may be obtained for a party’s liability to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll