header-logo header-logo

Breaking the silence

26 February 2009 / Roger Le Tissier
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Guernsey Company Law is no longer tacit on takeovers. Roger Le Tissier reports

Before 1 July 2008, Guernsey Company Law was silent in respect of takeovers. The new law, however, introduces provisions which will be of potential interest to targets and offerors alike. The Companies () Law 2008, Pt XVIII ss 335–340 sets out the entire statutory provisions relating to takeover sand applies where a scheme or contract involves the transfer of shares or any class of shares in an offeree company to any person. The principle is not unfamiliar in relation to other companies’ laws and provides sweep up provisions, where 90% of shareholders accept an offer. Practically speaking, if, within four months after the date of making an offer in respect of a scheme or contract, the offer is approved by shareholders comprising 90% in value of the shares affected, the offeror may, within two months after the expiration of those four months, give notice to any dissenting shareholder that it desires to acquire his shares. In calculating the 90% threshold,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll