header-logo header-logo

Breaking the silence

26 February 2009 / Roger Le Tissier
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Guernsey Company Law is no longer tacit on takeovers. Roger Le Tissier reports

Before 1 July 2008, Guernsey Company Law was silent in respect of takeovers. The new law, however, introduces provisions which will be of potential interest to targets and offerors alike. The Companies () Law 2008, Pt XVIII ss 335–340 sets out the entire statutory provisions relating to takeover sand applies where a scheme or contract involves the transfer of shares or any class of shares in an offeree company to any person. The principle is not unfamiliar in relation to other companies’ laws and provides sweep up provisions, where 90% of shareholders accept an offer. Practically speaking, if, within four months after the date of making an offer in respect of a scheme or contract, the offer is approved by shareholders comprising 90% in value of the shares affected, the offeror may, within two months after the expiration of those four months, give notice to any dissenting shareholder that it desires to acquire his shares. In calculating the 90% threshold,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll