header-logo header-logo

Breaking the silence

26 February 2009 / Roger Le Tissier
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Guernsey Company Law is no longer tacit on takeovers. Roger Le Tissier reports

Before 1 July 2008, Guernsey Company Law was silent in respect of takeovers. The new law, however, introduces provisions which will be of potential interest to targets and offerors alike. The Companies () Law 2008, Pt XVIII ss 335–340 sets out the entire statutory provisions relating to takeover sand applies where a scheme or contract involves the transfer of shares or any class of shares in an offeree company to any person. The principle is not unfamiliar in relation to other companies’ laws and provides sweep up provisions, where 90% of shareholders accept an offer. Practically speaking, if, within four months after the date of making an offer in respect of a scheme or contract, the offer is approved by shareholders comprising 90% in value of the shares affected, the offeror may, within two months after the expiration of those four months, give notice to any dissenting shareholder that it desires to acquire his shares. In calculating the 90% threshold,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll