header-logo header-logo

14 June 2018
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit amendment rejected

Prime minister escapes defeat with last-minute concessions

The Prime Minister has narrowly escaped defeat by making last-minute concessions over the House of Lords amendment to give Parliament a ‘meaningful vote’ on the final Brexit deal.  

The amendment to the EU (Withdrawal) Bill was rejected by just 26 votes. PM Theresa May quelled dissent by calling Conservative rebels into her office shortly before the vote and personally assuring them of a bigger say for MPs if she fails to reach a deal, and that she would spell out more details by the end of this week.

Peers could reinstate their plan when the Bill returns to the House of Lords, giving rebel MPs a second chance to hold May to account.

MPs also won a concession from the government that there would be no physical checks at the Northern Irish border.

Several MPs expressed anger at the lack of time allowed for debate, with Scottish Labour and SNP MPs particularly enraged that a mere 15 minutes were given to the subject of devolution.

An amendment to remove the date of exit from the Bill was defeated and the original date, 29 March 2019, reinstated.

Ahead of the debate, Justice Minister Phillip Lee resigned his office to vote against the government.

MPs were due to vote on amendments relating to membership of the single market and the customs union, on the second day of the debate, at the time of going to press.

Rosling King senior partner, Georgina Squire said: ‘After Brexit, we face considerable legal uncertainty—not only as to how our court system will be used, but also the laws it will enforce.

‘It can boil down to practicalities such as buying a car directly from an EU manufacturer after Brexit, which is faulty. Where does the recourse lie? Parliament is debating broad issues, but the details will affect us all every day and are far reaching.’

Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll