header-logo header-logo

14 June 2018
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit amendment rejected

Prime minister escapes defeat with last-minute concessions

The Prime Minister has narrowly escaped defeat by making last-minute concessions over the House of Lords amendment to give Parliament a ‘meaningful vote’ on the final Brexit deal.  

The amendment to the EU (Withdrawal) Bill was rejected by just 26 votes. PM Theresa May quelled dissent by calling Conservative rebels into her office shortly before the vote and personally assuring them of a bigger say for MPs if she fails to reach a deal, and that she would spell out more details by the end of this week.

Peers could reinstate their plan when the Bill returns to the House of Lords, giving rebel MPs a second chance to hold May to account.

MPs also won a concession from the government that there would be no physical checks at the Northern Irish border.

Several MPs expressed anger at the lack of time allowed for debate, with Scottish Labour and SNP MPs particularly enraged that a mere 15 minutes were given to the subject of devolution.

An amendment to remove the date of exit from the Bill was defeated and the original date, 29 March 2019, reinstated.

Ahead of the debate, Justice Minister Phillip Lee resigned his office to vote against the government.

MPs were due to vote on amendments relating to membership of the single market and the customs union, on the second day of the debate, at the time of going to press.

Rosling King senior partner, Georgina Squire said: ‘After Brexit, we face considerable legal uncertainty—not only as to how our court system will be used, but also the laws it will enforce.

‘It can boil down to practicalities such as buying a car directly from an EU manufacturer after Brexit, which is faulty. Where does the recourse lie? Parliament is debating broad issues, but the details will affect us all every day and are far reaching.’

Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—Jacqui Hayat & Andrew Bentham

Taylor Rose—Jacqui Hayat & Andrew Bentham

Taylor Rose strengthens Medical Negligence team with senior leadership appointments

Birmingham Law Society—Sabina Kauser

Birmingham Law Society—Sabina Kauser

Ward Hadaway partner appointed Vice President of Birmingham Law Society

Excello Law—Nick Gore & Irfan Ali

Excello Law—Nick Gore & Irfan Ali

Excello Law immigration boost with two more hires from Irwin Mitchell

NEWS
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
A divorced woman has secured funding to participate in her former husband’s inquest after the Legal Aid Agency reconsidered repeated refusals
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
back-to-top-scroll