header-logo header-logo

05 March 2020 / Diana Johnson
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Features , Competition , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit: competition time

16959
What does Brexit mean for the Competition & Markets Authority, asks Diana Johnson
  • The Competition and Markets Authority has issued guidance about how its role as the main UK competition law regulator will change following Brexit.
  • This article looks at how the Competition and Markets Authority will cope with the increased quantity and significance of cartels, mergers and competition investigations previously undertaken by the European Commission.

Following the departure of the UK from the EU at 11pm on Friday 31 January 2020, the UK has entered into a transition period until the end of December 2020 (transition period). During this transition period the UK and EU will attempt to negotiate an agreement to regulate their future trading relationship.

As part of the exit from the EU, the UK will move to become a standalone competition regime with effect from the end of the transition period. This change will have a significant effect on the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the UK’s principal competition regulator, and this article

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll