header-logo header-logo

10 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law , Family
printer mail-detail

Brexit consumes Parliament

MPs have defeated a second attempt by the prime minister to trigger an October election, demanded the government adhere to the rule of law and backed a motion calling for the publication of government communications relating to the prorogation of Parliament and the government’s own Operation Yellowhammer plans for a no-deal Brexit.

Meanwhile, legislation compelling the prime minister to seek a Brexit delay until 31 January 2020, unless MPs approve either a deal or leaving without a deal by 19 October, received royal assent. Earlier, concerns that the prime minister, who said he would ‘rather be dead in a ditch’ than delay Brexit past Halloween, would refuse to comply with the Act prompted former attorney general Dominic Grieve to warn the prime minister could be sent to prison if he refused to obey the law. Former director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald also warned that a refusal to comply with a court order to comply with the legislation would amount to contempt of court which could result in a prison sentence.

Parliament was prorogued shortly before 2am on Tuesday morning, with the result that several important Bills have been dropped. These include the Trade Bill, the Agriculture Bill and the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill.

Signalling his disappointment, former Lord Chancellor David Gauke tweeted: ‘Divorce reform is long overdue and the Bill had overwhelming support amongst the public and in Parliament. I hope Parliament can return to this asap.’

Forsters partner Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution’s family law reform group, said: ‘It’s obviously incredibly frustrating, given the support from politicians across the House, the judiciary, and the public, as well as Resolution members like myself. The argument for no fault divorce has been put and won, and it’s simply down to wider events in Westminster and elsewhere that the Bill is not continuing its smooth passage through Parliament.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll