header-logo header-logo

Brexit consumes Parliament

10 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law , Family
printer mail-detail
MPs have defeated a second attempt by the prime minister to trigger an October election, demanded the government adhere to the rule of law and backed a motion calling for the publication of government communications relating to the prorogation of Parliament and the government’s own Operation Yellowhammer plans for a no-deal Brexit.

Meanwhile, legislation compelling the prime minister to seek a Brexit delay until 31 January 2020, unless MPs approve either a deal or leaving without a deal by 19 October, received royal assent. Earlier, concerns that the prime minister, who said he would ‘rather be dead in a ditch’ than delay Brexit past Halloween, would refuse to comply with the Act prompted former attorney general Dominic Grieve to warn the prime minister could be sent to prison if he refused to obey the law. Former director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald also warned that a refusal to comply with a court order to comply with the legislation would amount to contempt of court which could result in a prison sentence.

Parliament was prorogued shortly before 2am on Tuesday morning, with the result that several important Bills have been dropped. These include the Trade Bill, the Agriculture Bill and the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill.

Signalling his disappointment, former Lord Chancellor David Gauke tweeted: ‘Divorce reform is long overdue and the Bill had overwhelming support amongst the public and in Parliament. I hope Parliament can return to this asap.’

Forsters partner Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution’s family law reform group, said: ‘It’s obviously incredibly frustrating, given the support from politicians across the House, the judiciary, and the public, as well as Resolution members like myself. The argument for no fault divorce has been put and won, and it’s simply down to wider events in Westminster and elsewhere that the Bill is not continuing its smooth passage through Parliament.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
back-to-top-scroll