header-logo header-logo

Brexit countdown on pensions

23 September 2020
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail
The clock is ticking for obtaining effective UK pension sharing orders after an overseas divorce once the Brexit transitional period ends on December 31, practitioners are warning

The Ministry of Justice says it is considering what changes to the law might be required to allow divorcing couples outside England and Wales to obtain pension sharing orders.

However, Michael Allum and Stuart Clark, partners with International Family Law Group, say they have been pressing the government for many years to change domestic law to fill the gap and they are concerned whether it can now be done in time.

Without that change, couples living and domiciled abroad will no longer be able to obtain a UK pension sharing order and may have to revisit settlements or negotiations to achieve a fair outcome.

The issue arises because, while the English family court has the power to make financial orders - including pension sharing orders - after an overseas divorce, there has to be a sufficient connection through habitual residence or the domicile of one spouse in England for the courts to be able to make the order. 

Allum and Clark say this will present a ‘real difficulty’ for international families who no longer have that connection.  It is currently possible to use a residual power within the EU Maintenance Regulation to make needs-based orders, including pension sharing orders, on an exceptional basis, provided the courts of no other EU Member State have jurisdiction. But that will end when the transition period ends.

‘While we welcome the MoJ's commitment, our firm has been calling for this change in the law throughout the Brexit discussions,' they say. 

‘But time is now short so we strongly encourage any couples and their lawyers presently working out divorce financial arrangements which may involve sharing a UK pension to make sure an order is obtained before the end of the year. If not, they may be forced to revisit settlements which have been reached or are in the process of being negotiated to find alternative ways of achieving a fair distribution of assets without including any pensions administered in England.’

Meanwhile, research shows judges and family practitioners are changing tack in their approach to pensions sharing, following Pensions Advisory Group recommendations last year. Read more here

 

 

Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll