header-logo header-logo

Brexit countdown on pensions

23 September 2020
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail
The clock is ticking for obtaining effective UK pension sharing orders after an overseas divorce once the Brexit transitional period ends on December 31, practitioners are warning

The Ministry of Justice says it is considering what changes to the law might be required to allow divorcing couples outside England and Wales to obtain pension sharing orders.

However, Michael Allum and Stuart Clark, partners with International Family Law Group, say they have been pressing the government for many years to change domestic law to fill the gap and they are concerned whether it can now be done in time.

Without that change, couples living and domiciled abroad will no longer be able to obtain a UK pension sharing order and may have to revisit settlements or negotiations to achieve a fair outcome.

The issue arises because, while the English family court has the power to make financial orders - including pension sharing orders - after an overseas divorce, there has to be a sufficient connection through habitual residence or the domicile of one spouse in England for the courts to be able to make the order. 

Allum and Clark say this will present a ‘real difficulty’ for international families who no longer have that connection.  It is currently possible to use a residual power within the EU Maintenance Regulation to make needs-based orders, including pension sharing orders, on an exceptional basis, provided the courts of no other EU Member State have jurisdiction. But that will end when the transition period ends.

‘While we welcome the MoJ's commitment, our firm has been calling for this change in the law throughout the Brexit discussions,' they say. 

‘But time is now short so we strongly encourage any couples and their lawyers presently working out divorce financial arrangements which may involve sharing a UK pension to make sure an order is obtained before the end of the year. If not, they may be forced to revisit settlements which have been reached or are in the process of being negotiated to find alternative ways of achieving a fair distribution of assets without including any pensions administered in England.’

Meanwhile, research shows judges and family practitioners are changing tack in their approach to pensions sharing, following Pensions Advisory Group recommendations last year. Read more here

 

 

Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll