header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Brexit & general election top quarterly DB risk survey

Brexit and general election fears are fuelling employer covenant risk concerns, research shows.

In defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, the employee is promised an ‘employer’s covenant’—a certain amount of pension when they retire. Therefore, the employer takes a risk that the investments over the years may not be successful enough to provide that amount.

Independent trustee firm PTL published its latest quarterly DB Risk Survey, which asks respondents to state the main risks facing DB pension schemes at a current point in time, this week.

Concern about a change in government rose from 6.2% to 8.7%. Concern about Brexit dipped marginally from 16.95% to 16.67%, but was substantially higher than previous figures of 13.79% in May 2018 and 10.95% in September 2017.

Richard Butcher, managing director at PTL, said: ‘In June 2017, one year after the European Referendum, concerns about employer covenant risk were at around 14%, but fast forward to the start of this year with an exit from the EU on the horizon but no deal agreed, and that figure has risen to 26%.

‘While direct concerns about Brexit and government are not rising significantly, the things that they impact are. It’s clear that the unclarified terms of Brexit are causing an everincreasing circle of uncertainty over everything in its path.’

Butcher commented that GDPR and cyber security concerns were now lower than expected because of a ‘bold response from the media and industry on cyber security which had helped to ensure that the threats were laid bare.

‘Pension savers, members, trustees, employers and schemes were able to educate and be educated, and take action as a result,’ he said.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll