header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Brexit & general election top quarterly DB risk survey

Brexit and general election fears are fuelling employer covenant risk concerns, research shows.

In defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, the employee is promised an ‘employer’s covenant’—a certain amount of pension when they retire. Therefore, the employer takes a risk that the investments over the years may not be successful enough to provide that amount.

Independent trustee firm PTL published its latest quarterly DB Risk Survey, which asks respondents to state the main risks facing DB pension schemes at a current point in time, this week.

Concern about a change in government rose from 6.2% to 8.7%. Concern about Brexit dipped marginally from 16.95% to 16.67%, but was substantially higher than previous figures of 13.79% in May 2018 and 10.95% in September 2017.

Richard Butcher, managing director at PTL, said: ‘In June 2017, one year after the European Referendum, concerns about employer covenant risk were at around 14%, but fast forward to the start of this year with an exit from the EU on the horizon but no deal agreed, and that figure has risen to 26%.

‘While direct concerns about Brexit and government are not rising significantly, the things that they impact are. It’s clear that the unclarified terms of Brexit are causing an everincreasing circle of uncertainty over everything in its path.’

Butcher commented that GDPR and cyber security concerns were now lower than expected because of a ‘bold response from the media and industry on cyber security which had helped to ensure that the threats were laid bare.

‘Pension savers, members, trustees, employers and schemes were able to educate and be educated, and take action as a result,’ he said.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll