header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Brexit & general election top quarterly DB risk survey

Brexit and general election fears are fuelling employer covenant risk concerns, research shows.

In defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, the employee is promised an ‘employer’s covenant’—a certain amount of pension when they retire. Therefore, the employer takes a risk that the investments over the years may not be successful enough to provide that amount.

Independent trustee firm PTL published its latest quarterly DB Risk Survey, which asks respondents to state the main risks facing DB pension schemes at a current point in time, this week.

Concern about a change in government rose from 6.2% to 8.7%. Concern about Brexit dipped marginally from 16.95% to 16.67%, but was substantially higher than previous figures of 13.79% in May 2018 and 10.95% in September 2017.

Richard Butcher, managing director at PTL, said: ‘In June 2017, one year after the European Referendum, concerns about employer covenant risk were at around 14%, but fast forward to the start of this year with an exit from the EU on the horizon but no deal agreed, and that figure has risen to 26%.

‘While direct concerns about Brexit and government are not rising significantly, the things that they impact are. It’s clear that the unclarified terms of Brexit are causing an everincreasing circle of uncertainty over everything in its path.’

Butcher commented that GDPR and cyber security concerns were now lower than expected because of a ‘bold response from the media and industry on cyber security which had helped to ensure that the threats were laid bare.

‘Pension savers, members, trustees, employers and schemes were able to educate and be educated, and take action as a result,’ he said.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll