header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: the endgame (Pt 2)

No deal—no problem? Michael Zander QC reviews the Institute for Government’s latest Brexit Report

  • The EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement.
  • The time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament will make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The Institute for Government has published a timely and sobering assessment of the difficulties of a No Deal exit from the EU. It suggests two reasons making No Deal likely.

  • First, while Boris Johnson says the Irish ‘backstop’ must go, the EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement and in particular that it will not consider removing the Irish ‘backstop’.
  • Second, even if the EU were willing to negotiate, the time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament would make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The problems before 31 October

There will be no ‘managed no deal’

The EU had made it clear that without a formal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll