header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: the endgame (Pt 2)

No deal—no problem? Michael Zander QC reviews the Institute for Government’s latest Brexit Report

  • The EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement.
  • The time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament will make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The Institute for Government has published a timely and sobering assessment of the difficulties of a No Deal exit from the EU. It suggests two reasons making No Deal likely.

  • First, while Boris Johnson says the Irish ‘backstop’ must go, the EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement and in particular that it will not consider removing the Irish ‘backstop’.
  • Second, even if the EU were willing to negotiate, the time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament would make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The problems before 31 October

There will be no ‘managed no deal’

The EU had made it clear that without a formal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll