header-logo header-logo

12 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit uncertainties

Peers heard evidence this week on the consequences for civil justice cooperation of the loss, post-Brexit, of the European Court of Justice jurisdiction. The House of Lords EU Justice Sub-Committee heard evidence on legal, regulatory and jurisdictional uncertainties following Brexit. Evidence on behalf of the Law Society was given by David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe, who is acting for Deir Dos Santos, applicant in the Art 50 case before the Supreme Court, and Helena Raulus of the Law Society. The Bar Council was represented by Hugh Mercer, Essex Court, and Timothy Scott QC, 29 Bedford Row.

Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll