header-logo header-logo

The Brexpert witness

24 February 2017 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Brexit , EU , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_pamplin

Chris Pamplin takes a broad view of the possible implications for expert witnesses of Britain’s exit from the EU

  • What approach will be taken in relation to the taking of evidence, including expert evidence, in cross-border litigation?

  • EU legislation such as the EU Taking of Evidence Regulation has simplified and assisted procedures.

  • Steps will be required to ensure that clauses giving exclusive jurisdiction to English courts continue to be effective.

Over the many years of Britain’s EU membership there have been numerous EU Directives, regulations and conventions, all of which have impacted on cross-border litigation in member states, eg the recognition and enforcement of judgments across borders, the determination of jurisdiction, the obtaining and taking of evidence, the investigation of civil and criminal cases and the availability of sanctions.

Alongside these wider issues there are also regulations in place governing such matters as legal assistance, money laundering, legal professional privilege and the European Arrest Warrant. New provisions must be put in place to cover all of these, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll