header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

In Brief

News

FAMILY AFFAIR

Family court procedures will be simplified and legal language modernised under plans announced this week by the government. A single unified code for family proceedings will be introduced, replacing the three different sets of rules which family court users currently have to consult. Archaic terms will be replaced with easier language: a decree nisi will be known as a conditional order; and a divorce petition will become an application for a divorce order. People involved in family proceedings will be able to serve court documents on each other by e-mail.

 

SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY

The current legal framework surrounding surveillance is “complex and unsatisfactory” and needs replacing, the Law Society says. The call follows the release of the Rose Report into Surveillance in which Sir Christopher Rose said that since 2005 there had been “no authorities for directed surveillance of legal visits in England and Wales to prisoners in custody in relation to terrorism or other matters”. However, the society says the scope of Rose’s inquiry was limited and it is calling for a more thorough review. Society president Andrew Holroyd says: “It is clear…we are living in a surveillance society...we would urge the government to take the opportunity to launch a more thoroughgoing review of the legal and practical safeguards that are needed to ensure our continuing rights and freedoms.”

 

RETIRING TYPES

The retirement age for recorders, deputy high court judges, deput y district judges, deputy masters and registrars is to be raised from 65 to 70, the lord chancellor, Jack Straw, has announced. It has been the policy since 1998 that those in such judicial posts should retire at 65 instead of their statutory retirement age of 70. However, the lord chancellor has now reviewed this practice and made the changes with the agreement of the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips. This brings the retirement age into line with the statutory retirement age for most judicial posts.

Issue: 7310 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll