header-logo header-logo

Bringing the house down

13 December 2007 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7301 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Mark Ryan explores the progress made thus far in the fiercely contested process of House of Lords reform

The House of Lords gave a first reading to the House of Lords Bill 2007 (HL Bill 3) on 7 November 2007. This private member’s Bill was introduced by Lord Steel and is similar to the House of Lords Bill he put before the house earlier this year. Although this first Bill was also in Lord Steel’s name (hence the sobriquet “the Steel Bill”), it was the result of an all-party group of both houses—the Campaign for an Effective Second Chamber—concerned to secure immediate and effective reform of the upper house.

The first Bill enjoyed a general welcome from their lordships as it received a second reading in July 2007. The second incarnation of the Bill (in an amended form) was introduced when the 2007–08 Parliamentary session opened.

The House of Lords Bill arguably represents the most significant development in terms of House of Lords reform since March 2007, when both Parliamentary houses voted on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll