header-logo header-logo

13 December 2007 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7301 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Bringing the house down

Mark Ryan explores the progress made thus far in the fiercely contested process of House of Lords reform

The House of Lords gave a first reading to the House of Lords Bill 2007 (HL Bill 3) on 7 November 2007. This private member’s Bill was introduced by Lord Steel and is similar to the House of Lords Bill he put before the house earlier this year. Although this first Bill was also in Lord Steel’s name (hence the sobriquet “the Steel Bill”), it was the result of an all-party group of both houses—the Campaign for an Effective Second Chamber—concerned to secure immediate and effective reform of the upper house.

The first Bill enjoyed a general welcome from their lordships as it received a second reading in July 2007. The second incarnation of the Bill (in an amended form) was introduced when the 2007–08 Parliamentary session opened.

The House of Lords Bill arguably represents the most significant development in terms of House of Lords reform since March 2007, when both Parliamentary houses voted on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll