header-logo header-logo

Broken Brits abroad

24 January 2014 / Stephanie Cope
Issue: 7591 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_cope

Stephanie Cope scrutinises a recent ruling on the liability of tour operators for accidents abroad

Those booking a holiday through a tour operator reasonably expect the travel and accommodation provided to meet the standards offered by the operator. But what of the holiday maker who suffers a personal injury while on holiday? The law in this area has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in Japp v Virgin Holidays Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1371, [2013] All ER (D) 99 (Nov). The judgment provides important clarification on the liability of tour operators for injuries involving defects in accommodation and seems generally to improve the position of the tour operator in such claims.

The law

The foundations in relation to a tour operator’s duty of care were laid in Wilson v Best Travel Limited [1993] 1 ALL ER 353 in the High Court. The claim was pursued under s 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Not surprisingly, Phillips J held that the duty of care includes a duty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll