THIS ISSUE

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7591

24 January 2014

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 3

Redhill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2014] All ER (D) 65 (Jan)

The Jackson reforms are centred around economics, not justice, says Neil Hudgell

Stephanie Cope scrutinises a recent ruling on the liability of tour operators for accidents abroad

Bring back Slander of Women Act! More on Mitchell & the curse of Sanctiongate

Patley Wood Farm LLP v Brake and another [2013] EWHC 4035 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 48 (Jan)

Shaw and another v Logue [2014] EWHC 5 (Admin)

Re LC (Children) [2014] UKSC 1, [2014] All ER (D) 62 (Jan)

Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc and other companies [2013] EWHC 4278 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 74 (Jan)

Re Parmeko Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) and other companies [2014] All ER (D) 39 (Jan)

Is expert opinion produced outside the court process admissible? Chris Pamplin reports

Show

Results

Go to page of 3

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations

What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection?

NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR

Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?

NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap

When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases

When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ

Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026

NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue

Error message

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7591

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean