Solicitor—Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal—Duty to give reasons

24 January 2014

Issue: 7591 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court

Shaw and another v Logue [2014] EWHC 5 (Admin)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Jay J, 13 January 2014

The standard of reasoning required from the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal was the same as that set out in South Bucks DC v Porter [2004] 1 WLR 1953; r 16(5) of the Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2007 requires no more and no less.

Timothy Dutton QC and Craig Ulyatt (instructed by Mayer Brown International LLP) for the applicant. John Wardell QC and Andrew Mold (instructed by RadcliffesLeBrasseur) for the respondent.

The two appellants (the solicitors) were both former solicitors. They acted for clients in proceedings in the Chancery Division against the respondents. The respondents succeeded in the litigation, and then complained to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) about the solicitors. They adduced evidence obtained in related litigation in the US. The SDT found misconduct proved and struck off the solicitors. The solicitors appealed under s 49 of the Solicitors Disciplinary Act 1974.

The grounds of appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Solicitor—Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal—Duty to give reasons

Shaw and another v Logue [2014] EWHC 5 (Admin)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Jay J, 13 January 2014

The grounds of appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock

The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement

NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape

Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?

In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match

NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms

Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats

Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes

Error message

Solicitor—Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal—Duty to give reasons

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan