header-logo header-logo

24 January 2014
Issue: 7591 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 24 January 2014

Bring back Slander of Women Act! More on Mitchell & the curse of Sanctiongate

REPUTABLE ACT

In the writer’s crazier dreams, he is libelled by a national newspaper and falsely imprisoned in a supermarket on the same day as consolation for the poor return on fixed rate savings accounts. The dreams of the media have been for freer speech and whilst, post- Leveson , it seems to be taking greater care, editors are blessing rather than cursing the Defamation Act 2013 which was commenced on 1 January 2014 in England and Wales by SI 2013/3027. Here’s our libel free tour of the legislative changes.

Seriously There will be no defamation unless the publication caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant’s reputation. For a body that trades for profit, serious financial loss must have been caused or be likely in order to qualify as serious harm. Trivial claims were already susceptible to strike out but the bar may now have been raised with the introduction of serious harm.

Defence swap

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll