header-logo header-logo

23 September 2011 / Patricia Leonard
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Brought to account

Patricia Leonard reviews the latest controversy to hit the banking industry

Banks in Britain, and abroad, have been subject to a fresh onslaught in recent weeks. British banks have found themselves subject to expansive and costly litigation, investigations by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and responding to the Basel III rules.

Three British banks—RBS, Barclays and HSBC—are among the 17 being sued in a multibillion pound lawsuit for allegedly mis-selling mortgage-backed securities by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). These were filed just as the limitation period was coming to an end and took the market by surprise, causing an immediate drop in share prices.

Some of the banks involved are already negotiating in the US with the attorneys general of all 50 states because of an investigation addressing mortgage abuse, making it more unlikely that a global settlement can be achieved. That these settlement negotiations are taking place in the US before a full investigation into mortgage abuses has even been completed shows how willing banks are to stave off costly litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll