header-logo header-logo

23 September 2011 / Patricia Leonard
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Brought to account

Patricia Leonard reviews the latest controversy to hit the banking industry

Banks in Britain, and abroad, have been subject to a fresh onslaught in recent weeks. British banks have found themselves subject to expansive and costly litigation, investigations by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and responding to the Basel III rules.

Three British banks—RBS, Barclays and HSBC—are among the 17 being sued in a multibillion pound lawsuit for allegedly mis-selling mortgage-backed securities by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). These were filed just as the limitation period was coming to an end and took the market by surprise, causing an immediate drop in share prices.

Some of the banks involved are already negotiating in the US with the attorneys general of all 50 states because of an investigation addressing mortgage abuse, making it more unlikely that a global settlement can be achieved. That these settlement negotiations are taking place in the US before a full investigation into mortgage abuses has even been completed shows how willing banks are to stave off costly litigation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll