header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment
printer mail-detail

Brussels to set environmental crime agenda

News

A range of environmental crimes could be introduced across the EU, with sentencing levels set by Brussels.

A proposed European Commission Directive would set fines and jail terms for nine offences, and assign minimum levels of punishment for the most serious of these.

The Commission wants to ensure criminal sanctions are consistent across the EU so that those who commit environmental crimes cannot take advantage of more lenient areas. For example, the Dutch government is currently conducting a criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of chemical waste in the Ivory Coast by a Dutch-owned company, in which 10 people died and hundreds fell ill, but in some EU countries this would not be possible.

Franco Frattini, the Commission’s vice president responsible for justice, freedom and security, says: “The proposed directive is crucial to avoid criminals profiting from the existing discrepancies in member states’ criminal law systems which damage the European environment. We cannot allow safe-havens of environmental crime inside the EU.”

The government says that although legislation is already in place in the UK to ensure that citizens and companies are held responsible for such crimes—ranging from those involving death or injury to the illegal disposal of waste—there is clearly a need to ensure that all member states effectively enforce environmental offences.

A Home Office spokeswoman adds: “It should not be the case that serious polluters can move around the EU in order to avoid facing penalties. This proposal from the European Commission is the starting point for future negotiations and UK ministers will have a full opportunity to determine how environmental offences are penalised across the EU. We will seek to ensure the legislation is both necessary and proportionate and clearly supported by the evidence.”

Under the proposed directive, member states would be required to ensure that a range of activities, such as the illegal shipment of waste and unlawful trade in endangered species or in ozone-depleting substances, already prohibited by EU or national legislation are considered criminal offences, when committed intentionally or with serious negligence.

Member states would have to impose custodial sentences of at least five years or financial penalties on offending companies of at least €750,000 for particularly serious crimes, such as those that have resulted in death or serious injury.

Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll