header-logo header-logo

Brussels to set environmental crime agenda

15 February 2007
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment
printer mail-detail

News

A range of environmental crimes could be introduced across the EU, with sentencing levels set by Brussels.

A proposed European Commission Directive would set fines and jail terms for nine offences, and assign minimum levels of punishment for the most serious of these.

The Commission wants to ensure criminal sanctions are consistent across the EU so that those who commit environmental crimes cannot take advantage of more lenient areas. For example, the Dutch government is currently conducting a criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of chemical waste in the Ivory Coast by a Dutch-owned company, in which 10 people died and hundreds fell ill, but in some EU countries this would not be possible.

Franco Frattini, the Commission’s vice president responsible for justice, freedom and security, says: “The proposed directive is crucial to avoid criminals profiting from the existing discrepancies in member states’ criminal law systems which damage the European environment. We cannot allow safe-havens of environmental crime inside the EU.”

The government says that although legislation is already in place in the UK to ensure that citizens and companies are held responsible for such crimes—ranging from those involving death or injury to the illegal disposal of waste—there is clearly a need to ensure that all member states effectively enforce environmental offences.

A Home Office spokeswoman adds: “It should not be the case that serious polluters can move around the EU in order to avoid facing penalties. This proposal from the European Commission is the starting point for future negotiations and UK ministers will have a full opportunity to determine how environmental offences are penalised across the EU. We will seek to ensure the legislation is both necessary and proportionate and clearly supported by the evidence.”

Under the proposed directive, member states would be required to ensure that a range of activities, such as the illegal shipment of waste and unlawful trade in endangered species or in ozone-depleting substances, already prohibited by EU or national legislation are considered criminal offences, when committed intentionally or with serious negligence.

Member states would have to impose custodial sentences of at least five years or financial penalties on offending companies of at least €750,000 for particularly serious crimes, such as those that have resulted in death or serious injury.

Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll