header-logo header-logo

07 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: When leases last hours

235038
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ

While English law recognises such brief terms under the Law of Property Act 1925, courts usually interpret them as contractual licences, not tenancies. Cases from Taylor v Caldwell to Krell v Henry illustrate that short, purpose-specific grants (such as hiring a concert hall or viewing the coronation procession) confer mere licences.

Yet Pawlowski notes no legal impossibility in very short leases, citing Irish and Australian precedents. Statutory changes will soon reshape the landscape: the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 will abolish assured shorthold and fixed-term tenancies, converting all residential lettings into periodic tenancies. Business leases under six months, meanwhile, remain outside Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 protection.

The shortest lets, he concludes, still pose lengthy questions of classification.

Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll