header-logo header-logo

BSB moves to dispel exam row

02 June 2020
Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has ordered Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) to conduct an ‘urgent reassessment’ of students’ needs, in response to exam complaints

The Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) exams in April were cancelled due to COVID-19. The BSB then contracted with US testing company Pearson VUE to run the exam online in August.

However, a group of students raised objections to the ‘unfair and discriminatory’ proposals, in a letter to the BSB this week. Candidates are required to have a private and quiet examination room, with no extraneous noise, and must be videoed by a webcam throughout the three-hour exam, which terminates automatically if the student moves away from the webcam.

The students called for open book conditions which allow for breaks. They complained about a ‘lack of prior consultation’ and ‘ongoing lack of information about the exams’ as well as the ‘potentially unfair and discriminatory impact’ on women, candidates with disabilities and candidates in other timezones, for example, 25 students are from Mauritius.

A survey conducted by the students, with 335 responses, found 93% agreed the requirements of the online exam would negatively affect their performance. Three-quarters did not have access to a quiet room. The survey highlighted other issues such as bladder problems, back pain and unreliable internet connectivity.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘BPTC providers will be in contact with students shortly to discuss their individual needs with them in the first instance. We are very conscious of the need to ensure that the arrangements we have made are fair for everyone and we are committed to working with relevant experts, providers and others as we prepare to deliver the exams, in line with the public sector equality duty and our duty to make reasonable adjustments and our wider commitment to accessibility. We will also be publishing further guidance for students around these issues shortly.’

Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll