header-logo header-logo

BSB moves to dispel exam row

02 June 2020
Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has ordered Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) to conduct an ‘urgent reassessment’ of students’ needs, in response to exam complaints

The Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) exams in April were cancelled due to COVID-19. The BSB then contracted with US testing company Pearson VUE to run the exam online in August.

However, a group of students raised objections to the ‘unfair and discriminatory’ proposals, in a letter to the BSB this week. Candidates are required to have a private and quiet examination room, with no extraneous noise, and must be videoed by a webcam throughout the three-hour exam, which terminates automatically if the student moves away from the webcam.

The students called for open book conditions which allow for breaks. They complained about a ‘lack of prior consultation’ and ‘ongoing lack of information about the exams’ as well as the ‘potentially unfair and discriminatory impact’ on women, candidates with disabilities and candidates in other timezones, for example, 25 students are from Mauritius.

A survey conducted by the students, with 335 responses, found 93% agreed the requirements of the online exam would negatively affect their performance. Three-quarters did not have access to a quiet room. The survey highlighted other issues such as bladder problems, back pain and unreliable internet connectivity.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘BPTC providers will be in contact with students shortly to discuss their individual needs with them in the first instance. We are very conscious of the need to ensure that the arrangements we have made are fair for everyone and we are committed to working with relevant experts, providers and others as we prepare to deliver the exams, in line with the public sector equality duty and our duty to make reasonable adjustments and our wider commitment to accessibility. We will also be publishing further guidance for students around these issues shortly.’

Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll