header-logo header-logo

02 June 2020
Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

BSB moves to dispel exam row

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has ordered Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) to conduct an ‘urgent reassessment’ of students’ needs, in response to exam complaints

The Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) exams in April were cancelled due to COVID-19. The BSB then contracted with US testing company Pearson VUE to run the exam online in August.

However, a group of students raised objections to the ‘unfair and discriminatory’ proposals, in a letter to the BSB this week. Candidates are required to have a private and quiet examination room, with no extraneous noise, and must be videoed by a webcam throughout the three-hour exam, which terminates automatically if the student moves away from the webcam.

The students called for open book conditions which allow for breaks. They complained about a ‘lack of prior consultation’ and ‘ongoing lack of information about the exams’ as well as the ‘potentially unfair and discriminatory impact’ on women, candidates with disabilities and candidates in other timezones, for example, 25 students are from Mauritius.

A survey conducted by the students, with 335 responses, found 93% agreed the requirements of the online exam would negatively affect their performance. Three-quarters did not have access to a quiet room. The survey highlighted other issues such as bladder problems, back pain and unreliable internet connectivity.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘BPTC providers will be in contact with students shortly to discuss their individual needs with them in the first instance. We are very conscious of the need to ensure that the arrangements we have made are fair for everyone and we are committed to working with relevant experts, providers and others as we prepare to deliver the exams, in line with the public sector equality duty and our duty to make reasonable adjustments and our wider commitment to accessibility. We will also be publishing further guidance for students around these issues shortly.’

Issue: 7889 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll