header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 February 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Bubbling over

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
robins_2

The government’s Magna Carta celebrations leave a bad taste in the mouths of legal aid campaigners, says Jon Robins

Chris Grayling’s global law summit to celebrate the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta is either a fittingly high-profile and dignified celebration of Britain’s unwritten constitution or else a grubby cash-in on our heritage to enable corporate lawyers to schmooze big business. You pays your money (£1,750 for a top ticket), you takes your choices.

I fear “Magna Carta fatigue” setting in. So far Melvyn Bragg, David Starkey and Helena Kennedy QC have all fronted their own BBC programmes on what Lord Denning once called “the greatest constitutional document of all times”. The charter was sealed by King John at Runnymede on 15 June 1215.

Focal point of ire

However, the summit which takes place later this month has become a focal point for the ire of legal aid campaigners. The event’s organisers haven’t helped themselves with a website that is a gift to snippy journalists. Such is the clanking mismatch between its attempt to evoke

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll