header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Building contract—Adjudication—Jurisdiction

Witney Town Council v Beam Construction (Cheltenham) Ltd [2011] EWHC 2332 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 12 Sep 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has reviewed the authorities relating to determining whether an adjudicator has been asked to determine more than one dispute.

Mark Raeside QC and Omar Eljadi (instructed by Dutton Gregory LLP) for the claimant. Ian Wright (instructed by Harrison Clark LLP) for the defendant.

By a building contract made in early 2010 (the contract), the claimant employed the defendant to design and construct a new community hall. The contract was in the JCT Design and Build form 2005, Revision 2, 2009, and contained an adjudication clause. Disputes arose concerning, among other things, the date that practical completion of the works occurred, various outstanding items of work, the extent to which the defendant was entitled to an extension of time and the amount of money due to the defendant from the claimant. In March 2011, the claimant purported to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll