header-logo header-logo

Building contract—Adjudication—Jurisdiction

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Witney Town Council v Beam Construction (Cheltenham) Ltd [2011] EWHC 2332 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 12 Sep 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has reviewed the authorities relating to determining whether an adjudicator has been asked to determine more than one dispute.

Mark Raeside QC and Omar Eljadi (instructed by Dutton Gregory LLP) for the claimant. Ian Wright (instructed by Harrison Clark LLP) for the defendant.

By a building contract made in early 2010 (the contract), the claimant employed the defendant to design and construct a new community hall. The contract was in the JCT Design and Build form 2005, Revision 2, 2009, and contained an adjudication clause. Disputes arose concerning, among other things, the date that practical completion of the works occurred, various outstanding items of work, the extent to which the defendant was entitled to an extension of time and the amount of money due to the defendant from the claimant. In March 2011, the claimant purported to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll