header-logo header-logo

Burn-and-remint in asset recovery

249007
© Getty images

UK law enforcement is failing to use the tools at its disposal, argue Ashley Fairbrother & Rhys Evans

In the last decade, Tether’s ‘burn‑and‑remint’ mechanism has quietly become one of the most powerful asset recovery tools available to law enforcement agencies worldwide. By freezing illicit USDT, burning the tainted tokens and reminting clean equivalents to an authorised government wallet, Tether has enabled the rapid preservation and repatriation of millions in stolen cryptoassets in fraud, romance scams, hacking and money-laundering investigations (see ‘Burn-and-remint: a new tool in cryptoasset recovery?’ 175 NLJ 8099, pp17-18).

US law enforcement agencies now deploy this tool with speed, confidence and technical precision. The UK, however, does not.

This article sets out how, in collaboration with US authorities, Edmonds Marshall McMahon (EMM) secured the first successful burn‑and‑remint recovery into the hands of a UK-represented victim, and how this was achieved without any assistance, regrettably, from UK law enforcement, despite clear statutory powers introduced by Parliament expressly to enable such interventions.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll