header-logo header-logo

Burn-and-remint in asset recovery

249007
© Getty images

UK law enforcement is failing to use the tools at its disposal, argue Ashley Fairbrother & Rhys Evans

In the last decade, Tether’s ‘burn‑and‑remint’ mechanism has quietly become one of the most powerful asset recovery tools available to law enforcement agencies worldwide. By freezing illicit USDT, burning the tainted tokens and reminting clean equivalents to an authorised government wallet, Tether has enabled the rapid preservation and repatriation of millions in stolen cryptoassets in fraud, romance scams, hacking and money-laundering investigations (see ‘Burn-and-remint: a new tool in cryptoasset recovery?’ 175 NLJ 8099, pp17-18).

US law enforcement agencies now deploy this tool with speed, confidence and technical precision. The UK, however, does not.

This article sets out how, in collaboration with US authorities, Edmonds Marshall McMahon (EMM) secured the first successful burn‑and‑remint recovery into the hands of a UK-represented victim, and how this was achieved without any assistance, regrettably, from UK law enforcement, despite clear statutory powers introduced by Parliament expressly to enable such interventions.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll