header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Hartley Foster
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Burning bridges

Has the EU’s “carbon trading” market gone up in smoke? Hartley Foster investigates

Transfers of EUAs between taxable persons under the European Union’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System (ETS) are treated as a supply of services for VAT purposes.

They are taxable where the recipient of those services is established. Given their high value and the fact that they can be easily traded in (lightly regulated) specialised markets, this makes the carbon trade market susceptible to what is known as “carousel” or “MTIC fraud”.

The origins of MTIC fraud

The fons et origo of MTIC fraud was the introduction of the EU’s internal market in 1993.

Completing the internal market became a political priority in the early 1980s. The EC Commission proposed that the “origin system” be introduced in relation to supplies between member states. This would involve charging VAT in, and at the rate applicable in, the country of origin of the goods and services. For this system to work effectively, rates of VAT would need to be approximated throughout the EC. For this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll