header-logo header-logo

19 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business Network promotes rule of law

The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law’s new Business Network launched this week, with the support of several FTSE 100 leaders, including BP, BT, Diageo, HSBC, Shell, Unilever, and Vodafone.

The Bingham Centre wants to promote a clear understanding of the importance of the rule of law in facilitating trade and laying the foundations for economic growth. The Centre focuses particularly on developing states

The Business Network, chaired by Graham Vinter, formerly of BG Group, will support the think tank’s global initiatives while identifying and addressing specific challenges in the countries where they operate.

Vinter said multinational companies faced “a complex set of legal risks, including contractual enforceability, regulatory predictability and bribery and corruption in all its forms, none of which can be addressed without the rule of law”.

The majority of executives have in the past five years experienced several rule of law failures in countries in which they are investing, according to a survey of 300 senior decision-makers at Forbes 2000 companies conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit for The Bingham Centre. Examples include expropriation by governments of key assets, retrospective taxation, poor protection of intellectual property rights and unenforceability of promises. The survey found that these had resulted in financial loss for multinational companies and damage to local economies.

Welcoming the initiative, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, said: “The rule of law provides the foundation for peace, political stability, human dignity and economic sustainability.

“The business community needs the firm and consistent application of the rule of law, thus contributing to economic development. Business can also play a key part in helping to build and sustain the rule of law in those countries where it has a presence, helping to make the world a safer and more equitable place.”

Some projects under consideration by the Business Network include the implications of Brexit on trade and investment, the proportionality of regulatory penalties and forms of redress, tensions between national and international human rights standards, and rule of law training and resources for boards and senior managers.

Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll