header-logo header-logo

19 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business Network promotes rule of law

The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law’s new Business Network launched this week, with the support of several FTSE 100 leaders, including BP, BT, Diageo, HSBC, Shell, Unilever, and Vodafone.

The Bingham Centre wants to promote a clear understanding of the importance of the rule of law in facilitating trade and laying the foundations for economic growth. The Centre focuses particularly on developing states

The Business Network, chaired by Graham Vinter, formerly of BG Group, will support the think tank’s global initiatives while identifying and addressing specific challenges in the countries where they operate.

Vinter said multinational companies faced “a complex set of legal risks, including contractual enforceability, regulatory predictability and bribery and corruption in all its forms, none of which can be addressed without the rule of law”.

The majority of executives have in the past five years experienced several rule of law failures in countries in which they are investing, according to a survey of 300 senior decision-makers at Forbes 2000 companies conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit for The Bingham Centre. Examples include expropriation by governments of key assets, retrospective taxation, poor protection of intellectual property rights and unenforceability of promises. The survey found that these had resulted in financial loss for multinational companies and damage to local economies.

Welcoming the initiative, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, said: “The rule of law provides the foundation for peace, political stability, human dignity and economic sustainability.

“The business community needs the firm and consistent application of the rule of law, thus contributing to economic development. Business can also play a key part in helping to build and sustain the rule of law in those countries where it has a presence, helping to make the world a safer and more equitable place.”

Some projects under consideration by the Business Network include the implications of Brexit on trade and investment, the proportionality of regulatory penalties and forms of redress, tensions between national and international human rights standards, and rule of law training and resources for boards and senior managers.

Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll