header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Christopher Mccrudden
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Buying equality?

Do government proposals to expand the use of public procurement do enough to promote equality of opportunity? asks Christopher McCrudden

In an important but largely overlooked move, the Department of Communities and Local Government published its consultation, A Framework for Fairness: Proposals for a Single Equality Bill for Great Britain, on 12 June. The proposals, resulting from the work of the Discrimination Law Review (DLR), look to initiate wide-ranging debate during the autumn and beyond about how far governments should go in legislating to promote equality of opportunity.

A significant element in the government’s proposed strategy is to step up the use of public procurement to achieve change in the private sector, as part of the existing statutory equality duties in the areas of race, disability, and gender. The consultation paper says:

“We are keen to ensure that public
authorities build equality considerations into their procurement processes, within the overarching legal and policy framework for public procurement, where this will contribute to the achievement of their equality objectives.”

POLICY SHIFT

This statement may appear anodyne,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll